gutasiho
Gold Member | Редактировать | Профиль | Сообщение | Цитировать | Сообщить модератору
Цитата: Reflect X vs Hasleo v4.9.3 ----------------------------- CPU: i7-10700, 8-core/16-thread, 2.9/4.8ghz RAM: 32gB Source disk: NvME M2.2280, PCiE v3 (7-part <1 FAT@102.6mB, 1 unf@16mB, 1 NTFS@66.1gB, 1 NTFS@481.6mB, 1 ext@22.83gB, 1 NTFS@51.02gB & 1 NTFS@974.6mB) ----------------------------- Target disk: NvME M2.2280, PCiE v3 MEDIUM compression, no image checks following imaging operation Hasleo v4.9.3: 4m 57s (Image size=83.5gB) Reflect v10 : 3m 9s (Image size=71.4) Remember, Macrium REFLECT X is now using an entirely new streaming compression method, when imaging, obtained from a Facebook developer. As a result, the image format (not the method) is now PUBLIC and available to all if interested. ...and I believe Hasleo does not know how (just a guess here) to determine the USED space of an EXT<n> partition, that's why the image is 12gB larger. Macrium REFLECT does know how to do this. |
Цитата: Yes, HBS doesn't support EXT partitions |
| Всего записей: 7752 | Зарегистр. 14-09-2020 | Отправлено: 08:32 11-10-2024 | Исправлено: gutasiho, 09:22 11-10-2024 |
|